Sponsor:
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
Collaborator:
-
Studienleiter
Christoph Bert, Prof. Dr. rer. nat Principal Investigator Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik Florian Putz, PD Dr. med. Principal Investigator Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik
Kontakt
Christoph Bert, Prof. Dr. rer. nat Kontakt: Phone: ++49(0)9131-85-44213 E-Mail: christoph.bert@uk-erlangen.de» Kontaktdaten anzeigen Florian Putz, PD Dr. med. Kontakt: Phone: ++49(0)9131-85-33405 E-Mail: florian.putz@uk-erlangen.de» Kontaktdaten anzeigen
1. Proportion of patients that can successfully be treated in an MRI-only workflow (Time Frame - 12 month): All criteria have to be met for the MRI-only workflow to be classified as successful:
Verification criteria that will be assessed:
Can the sCT be generated and is the sCT clinically utilizable?
Are the three rotations needed for CT-MRI registration each ≤ 3°?
Can a treatment plan be generated and verified using the sCT?
Is the dosimetric difference between sCT and CT based treatment plan in the planning target volume ≤ 3%?
Is the dosimetric difference between the sCT and CT based treatment plan in affected organs at risk (receiving > 10% of prescribed dose) ≤ 3%?
Are the couch correction parameters during patient positioning in the rotational degrees of freedom ≤ 3°?
Secondary outcome:
1. Reasons that lead to unfeasibility of an MRI-only workflow (Time Frame - 12 month): Presence (Yes/No) of individual reasons responsible for the unfeasibility of the MRI-only workflow, as assessed with a predefined checklist.
2. Dosimetric differences between MRI-only and standard workflow for radiotherapy treatment planning (Time Frame - 12 month): Paired difference in Dose-volume-histogram parameters (Target coverage, mean, median, near maximum and minimum dose) between MRI-only and standard radiotherapy treatment workflow.
3. Measurement of intra-MRI patient positional changes (Time Frame - 12 month): Patient shift (vector magnitude) and rotational errors occuring during the course of MRI acquisition due to patient movement, as assessed by rigid registration of the last acquired MRI sequence in reference to the first sequence.
4. Organ at risk contouring accuracy on MRI data (Time Frame - 12 month): Similarity of organ at risk segmentations defined in MRI compared to reference segmentations defined in CT as assessed by the volumetric and surface Dice score, as well as mean surface and Hausdorff distances.