1. Working memory performance at post-assessment (Time Frame - 3 weeks): Performance in a near transfer task (n-back) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition; operationalized by % correct responses in the n-back task
Secondary outcome:
1. Working memory performance at follow-up assessment (Time Frame - 4 weeks after training): Performance in a near transfer task (n-back) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition; operationalized by % correct responses in the n-back task
2. Working memory training performance (Letter Updating Task) at post-assessment (Time Frame - 3 weeks): Performance in primary memory training task (Letter Updating Task) at post-assessment, operationalized by number of correctly recalled lists in the letter updating task
3. Working memory training performance (Letter Updating Task) at follow-up assessment (Time Frame - 4 weeks after training): Performance in primary memory training task (Letter Updating Task) at follow-up assessment, operationalized by number of correctly recalled lists in the letter updating task
4. Quality of Life at post-assessment (Time Frame - 3 weeks): PROMIS score for HRQoL (PROPr score) and scores of subscales (e.g. cognitive function)
5. Quality of Life at follow-up assessment (Time Frame - 4 weeks after training): PROMIS score for HRQoL (PROPr score) and scores of subscales (e.g. cognitive function)
6. Visuo-spatial performance at post-assessment (Time Frame - 3 weeks): Visuo-spatial performance at post-assessment operationalized by number of correctly recalled items in the VR task.
7. Visuo-spatial performance at follow-up assessment (Time Frame - 3 weeks): Visuo-spatial performance at follow-up assessment operationalized by number of correctly recalled items in the VR task.