Collaborator:
European Commission, INESC TEC - Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (Porto, Portugal), Cankado GmbH, FCiências.ID - Associação para a Investigação e Desenvolvimento de Ciências (Lisbon, Portugal), Bocconi University,
Studienleiter
Maria-Joao Cardoso, PhD Principal Investigator Champalimaud Foundation
1. Agreement between patients expectations before and after treatment in both the intervention and the control arm (Time Frame - 12 months after locoregional treatment (surgery or radiotherapy in case adjuvant radiotherapy is done)): Agreement between patient's expectations about the aesthetic outcome measured before and after treatment, evaluated at 12 months after treatment (Cohen's Kappa and weighted Kappa Statistics) both the intervention and the control arm.
2. Agreement about the aesthetic outcome between the objective evaluation and self- evaluation measured after treatment in both the intervention and the control arm (Time Frame - 12 months after locoregional treatment (surgery or radiotherapy in case adjuvant radiotherapy is done)): Agreement about the aesthetic outcome between the AI evaluation tool (BCT.core software) and self- evaluation after treatment (Cohen's Kappa and weighted Kappa Statistics) in both the intervention and the control arm.
Secondary outcome:
1. Patient's body image satisfaction after surgery measured through the BREAST-Q - International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) questionnaire (Time Frame - 12 months after locoregional treatment (surgery or radiotherapy in case adjuvant radiotherapy is done)): Body image perception and satisfaction using the BREAST-Q ICHOM questionnaire. The scale scores from 0 lowest to 100 highest (body image satisfaction) in both the intervention and the control arm.
2. Resource consumption a) time spent in hospital b) number of appointments c) duration until treatment d) out of pocket expenditure, additional care sought by patients (Time Frame - 12 months after locoregional treatment (surgery or radiotherapy in case adjuvant radiotherapy is done): Resource consumption (cost per patient evaluated by the amount of appointments between the surgical proposal by the surgeon and the end of the trial) in both the intervention and control arm.
3. Patient's general health-related quality of life evaluated in both the intervention and control arm with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (Time Frame - 12 months after locoregional treatment (surgery or radiotherapy in case adjuvant radiotherapy is done)): How results impact in patients general quality of life evaluated in both the intervention and control arm with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The scale scores from 0 lowest to 100 highest. A high scale score represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
Experimental: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health Arm Using an Artificial Intelligence approach integrated in a cloud-based healthcare platform CANKADO to give the patient complete information about the proposed type of locoregional treatment and access to photographs and data of patients with similar characteristics previously treated with the same technique. All interaction will be through the CANKADO Platform.
Other: Control Comparator The standard approach of proposing patients for locoregional treatment with or without printed or digital materials and hypothetic visualization of results.
Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health Arm (Artificial Intelligence and cloud-based digital health platform): A previous large database repository of images having thousands of pre and postoperative photographs of breast cancer patients proposed for locoregional treatment with clinical and biometric data will be matched using artificial intelligence within the CANKADO platform. Patients proposed for breast cancer locoregional treatment will have access to the software installed, and they will have access to all the information about the type of treatment they will receive. All the questions and questionnaires will be filled out online, and they can visualise the expected outcome from excellent to poor.
Quelle: ClinicalTrials.gov
Sie können folgenden Inhalt einem Kollegen empfehlen:
"Comparing Decision on Aesthetics After Breast Cancer Locoregional Treatment."
Bitte tragen Sie auch die Absenderdaten vollständig ein, damit Sie der Empfänger erkennen kann.
Die mit (*) gekennzeichneten Angaben müssen eingetragen werden!